Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 55, No. 6, June 2009, pp. 968-979
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow e-companion
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chatterjee, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Name-Your-Own-Price Channel in the Travel Industry: An Analytical Exploration

Tuo Wang, Esther Gal-Or, Rabikar Chatterjee

College of Business Administration, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260

twang3{at}kent.edu
esther{at}katz.pitt.edu
rabikar{at}katz.pitt.edu

Name-your-own-price (NYOP) retailers, such as Priceline, offer an alternative distribution channel for service providers in the travel industry such as airlines, hotels, and car rental companies. Our research employs an analytical model to identify and understand key trade-offs driving the decision by a service provider to employ an NYOP channel, assuming that such a channel is available. This decision requires the existence of forces that counteract the adverse consequences of cannibalization of sales through traditional posted-price channels. Our analysis provides some insight into these forces. Contracting with the NYOP retailer facilitates market segmentation and price discrimination, and allows for disposal of excess capacity after meeting business travel demand. However, the cost of this flexibility is that the service provider can no longer credibly precommit to maintaining high prices when there is unsold capacity. Also, when contracting with an independent retailer, the service provider is unable to extract the entire revenue generated from NYOP consumers. A key insight from our model is that the rationale for contracting with an NYOP retailer is driven by the uncertainty in business travel demand, not the expectation of excess capacity. Indeed, all else equal, the larger the capacity, the less likely it is that contracting with an NYOP retailer is the right decision on the part of the service provider.

Key Words: pricing; name-your-own-price channel; bidding; Bayesian Nash equilibrium; e-commerce
History: Received: October 28, 2006; accepted: February 7, 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.