Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 55, No. 3, March 2009, pp. 421-437
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0949
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow e-companion
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chick, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gans, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Economic Analysis of Simulation Selection Problems

Stephen E. Chick, Noah Gans

Technology and Operations Management Area, INSEAD, 77305 Fontainebleau, France
Operations and Information Management Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

stephen.chick{at}insead.edu
gans{at}wharton.upenn.edu

Ranking and selection procedures are standard methods for selecting the best of a finite number of simulated design alternatives based on a desired level of statistical evidence for correct selection. But the link between statistical significance and financial significance is indirect, and there has been little or no research into it. This paper presents a new approach to the simulation selection problem, one that maximizes the expected net present value of decisions made when using stochastic simulation. We provide a framework for answering these managerial questions: When does a proposed system design, whose performance is unknown, merit the time and money needed to develop a simulation to infer its performance? For how long should the simulation analysis continue before a design is approved or rejected? We frame the simulation selection problem as a "stoppable" version of a Bayesian bandit problem that treats the ability to simulate as a real option prior to project implementation. For a single proposed system, we solve a free boundary problem for a heat equation that approximates the solution to a dynamic program that finds optimal simulation project stopping times and that answers the managerial questions. For multiple proposed systems, we extend previous Bayesian selection procedures to account for discounting and simulation-tool development costs.

Key Words: simulation; ranking and selection; economics of simulation; optimal stopping; free boundary problem
History: Received: January 8, 2008;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
J. R. W. Merrick
Bayesian Simulation and Decision Analysis: An Expository Survey
Decision Analysis, December 1, 2009; 6(4): 222 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.