|
|
||||||||
Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Developing the "right" new products is critical to firm success and is often cited as a key competitive dimension. This paper explores new product development (NPD) portfolio strategy and the balance between incremental and radical innovation. We characterize innovative effort through a normative theoretical framework that addresses a popular practice in NPD portfolio management: the use of strategic buckets. Strategic buckets encourage the division of the overall NPD resource budget into smaller, more focused budgets that are defined by the type of innovative effort (incremental or radical). We show that time commitment determines the balance between incremental and radical innovation. When managers execute this balance, they are often confounded by (i) environmental complexity, defined as the number of unknown interdependencies among technology and market parameters that determine product performance; and (ii) environmental instability, the probability of changes to the underlying performance functions. Although both of these factors confound managers, we find that they have completely opposite effects on the NPD portfolio balance. Environmental complexity shifts the balance toward radical innovation. Conversely, environmental instability shifts the balance toward incremental innovation. Risk considerations and implications for theory and practice are also discussed.
College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30308
chaor{at}darden.virginia.edu
stelios{at}gatech.edu
History: Received: November 15, 2004;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. O. Chao, S. Kavadias, and C. Gaimon Revenue Driven Resource Allocation: Funding Authority, Incentives, and New Product Development Portfolio Management Management Science, September 1, 2009; 55(9): 1556 - 1569. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |