Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 54, No. 5, May 2008, pp. 907-921
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0828
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow e-companion
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chao, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Kavadias, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

A Theoretical Framework for Managing the New Product Development Portfolio: When and How to Use Strategic Buckets

Raul O. Chao, Stylianos Kavadias

Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30308

chaor{at}darden.virginia.edu
stelios{at}gatech.edu

Developing the "right" new products is critical to firm success and is often cited as a key competitive dimension. This paper explores new product development (NPD) portfolio strategy and the balance between incremental and radical innovation. We characterize innovative effort through a normative theoretical framework that addresses a popular practice in NPD portfolio management: the use of strategic buckets. Strategic buckets encourage the division of the overall NPD resource budget into smaller, more focused budgets that are defined by the type of innovative effort (incremental or radical). We show that time commitment determines the balance between incremental and radical innovation. When managers execute this balance, they are often confounded by (i) environmental complexity, defined as the number of unknown interdependencies among technology and market parameters that determine product performance; and (ii) environmental instability, the probability of changes to the underlying performance functions. Although both of these factors confound managers, we find that they have completely opposite effects on the NPD portfolio balance. Environmental complexity shifts the balance toward radical innovation. Conversely, environmental instability shifts the balance toward incremental innovation. Risk considerations and implications for theory and practice are also discussed.

Key Words: new product development; NPD portfolio strategy; incremental innovation; radical innovation; strategic buckets; complex systems; evolutionary systems
History: Received: November 15, 2004;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
R. O. Chao, S. Kavadias, and C. Gaimon
Revenue Driven Resource Allocation: Funding Authority, Incentives, and New Product Development Portfolio Management
Management Science, September 1, 2009; 55(9): 1556 - 1569.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.