Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 53, No. 8, August 2007, pp. 1269-1288
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0700
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow e-companion
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Mieghem, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Risk Mitigation in Newsvendor Networks: Resource Diversification, Flexibility, Sharing, and Hedging

Jan A. Van Mieghem

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
vanmieghem{at}kellogg.northwestern.edu

This paper studies how judicious resource allocation in networks mitigates risk. Theory is presented for general utility functions and mean-variance formulations and is illustrated with networks featuring resource diversification, flexibility (e.g., inventory substitution), and sharing (commonality). In contrast to single-resource settings, risk-averse newsvendors may invest more in networks than risk-neutral newsvendors: some resources and even total spending may exceed risk-neutral levels. With normally distributed demand, risk-averse newsvendors change resource levels roughly proportionally to demand variance, while risk-neutral agents adjust only proportionally to standard deviation.

Two effects explain this operational hedge and suggest rules of thumb for strategic placement of safety capacity and inventory in networks: (1) Risk pooling suggests rebalancing capacity toward inexpensive resources that serve lower-profit variance markets. This highlights the role of profit variance (instead of demand variance) in risk-averse network investment. (2) Ex post revenue maximization suggests rebalancing capacity toward substitutable flexible but away from shared capacity when markets differ in profitability. Capacity imbalance and allocation flexibility thus mitigate profit risk and truly are operational hedges.

Key Words: risk aversion; mean-variance; capacity; inventory; investment; balance; real options; network design
History: Received: March 25, 2004;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MSOMHome page
L. X. Lu and J. A. Van Mieghem
Multimarket Facility Network Design with Offshoring Applications
MSOM, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 90 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S.-H. Kim, M. A. Cohen, and S. Netessine
Performance Contracting in After-Sales Service Supply Chains
Management Science, December 1, 2007; 53(12): 1843 - 1858.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.