|
|
||||||||
Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
In this paper, we quantify the efficiency of decentralized supply chains that use price-only contracts. With a price-only contract, a buyer and a seller agree only on a constant transaction price, without specifying the amount that will be transferred. It is well known that these contracts do not provide incentives to the parties to coordinate their inventory/capacity decisions. We measure efficiency with the price of anarchy (PoA), defined as the largest ratio of profits between the integrated supply chain (that is, fully coordinated) and the decentralized supply chain. We characterize the efficiency of various supply chain configurations: push or pull inventory positioning, two or more stages, serial or assembly systems, single or multiple competing suppliers, and single or multiple competing retailers.
Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
georgiap{at}mit.edu
groels{at}anderson.ucla.edu
History: Received: September 23, 2005;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Cominetti, J. R. Correa, and N. E. Stier-Moses The Impact of Oligopolistic Competition in Networks Operations Research, November 1, 2009; 57(6): 1421 - 1437. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Maille and N. E. Stier-Moses Eliciting Coordination with Rebates Transportation Science, November 1, 2009; 43(4): 473 - 492. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Martinez-de-Albeniz and D. Simchi-Levi Competition in the Supply Option Market Operations Research, September 1, 2009; 57(5): 1082 - 1097. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Johari and J. N. Tsitsiklis Efficiency of Scalar-Parameterized Mechanisms Operations Research, July 1, 2009; 57(4): 823 - 839. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |