Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 53, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 834-848
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0640
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kocabiyikoglu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Popescu, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Managerial Motivation Dynamics and Incentives

Ayse Kocabiyikoglu, Ioana Popescu

Department of Management, Bilkent University, Bilkent, Ankara 06800, Turkey
Decision Sciences Area, INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77300 Fontainebleau, France

aysekoca{at}bilkent.edu.tr
ioana.popescu{at}insead.edu

Firms can increase profitability by appropriately motivating managers. We investigate drivers of managerial motivation, and propose how firms can use performance pay to alter motivational patterns. We focus on the agent’s optimal effort decision in trading off compensation utility with effort cost in a static and dynamic setting. Surprisingly, we find that lower risk aversion or increased pay are not necessarily motivating factors, and identify the relevant effort drivers underlying the agent’s utility and compensation plan. We characterize properties of agents’ preferences for output lotteries (risk aversion, aggressiveness, prudence) that trigger systematic motivational patterns with respect to a variety of factors, such as the agent’s productivity and past performance, time to evaluation, the firm’s capabilities, and market factors. Our insights are robust, holding under very general modeling assumptions on preferences, rewards, and the stochastic effort-output function.

Key Words: decision analysis; risk preferences; risk aversion; incentives; salesforce compensation
History: Received: November 9, 2005;





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.