Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 53, No. 3, March 2007, pp. 421-436
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0634
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tsung, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Pushing Quality Improvement Along Supply Chains

Kaijie Zhu, Rachel Q. Zhang, Fugee Tsung

Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong

kzhu{at}ust.hk
rzhang{at}ust.hk
season{at}ust.hk

In this paper, we consider a buyer who designs a product and owns the brand, yet outsources the production to a supplier. Both the buyer and the supplier incur quality-related costs, e.g., costs of customer goodwill and future market share loss by the buyer and warranty-related costs shared by both the buyer and the supplier whenever a nonconforming item is sold to a customer. Therefore, both parties have an incentive to invest in quality-improvement efforts. This paper explores the roles of different parties in a supply chain in quality improvement. We show that the buyer’s involvement can have a significant impact on the profits of both parties and of the supply chain as a whole, and he cannot cede the responsibility of quality improvement to the supplier in many cases. We also investigate how quality-improvement decisions interact with operational decisions such as the buyer’s order quantity and the supplier’s production lot size.

Key Words: quality cost; supply chain; quality improvement
History: Received: February 25, 2004;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
A. Federgruen and N. Yang
Competition Under Generalized Attraction Models: Applications to Quality Competition Under Yield Uncertainty
Management Science, December 1, 2009; 55(12): 2028 - 2043.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
G. H. Chao, S. M. R. Iravani, and R. C. Savaskan
Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts
Management Science, July 1, 2009; 55(7): 1122 - 1138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
F. Bernstein and A. G. Kok
Dynamic Cost Reduction Through Process Improvement in Assembly Networks
Management Science, April 1, 2009; 55(4): 552 - 567.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.