|
|
||||||||
Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
Studying the U.S. personal computer industry from its inception in 1974 through 1994, we address the following questions. What product technology strategies increase the survival chances of entrants into new, technologically dynamic industries? Does the effectiveness of these strategies differ by pre-entry experience? Does the effectiveness of these strategies differ by when firms enter a new industry? Consistent with the published literature, we find that diversifying entrants have an initial survival advantage over entrepreneurial startups. But, we find the reverse for later entrants: startups that enter later in the industry have a survival advantage over the later entering diversifying entrants. We explain this finding in terms of the firms' product technology strategies (i.e., offering products based on the technology standard and products incorporating the latest technology), pre-entry experience, and entry timing. Our findings highlight that it is crucial to study what firms do after they enter a new industry to more completely understand their ultimate performance.
College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61822
barry_bayus{at}unc.edu
agarwalr{at}uiuc.edu
History: Received: November 9, 2004;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Dencker, M. Gruber, and S. K. Shah Pre-Entry Knowledge, Learning, and the Survival of New Firms Organization Science, May 1, 2009; 20(3): 516 - 537. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Agarwal and C. E. Helfat Strategic Renewal of Organizations Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 281 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |