Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 53, No. 12, December 2007, pp. 1887-1902
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0737
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayus, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Role of Pre-Entry Experience, Entry Timing, and Product Technology Strategies in Explaining Firm Survival

Barry L. Bayus, Rajshree Agarwal

Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61822

barry_bayus{at}unc.edu
agarwalr{at}uiuc.edu

Studying the U.S. personal computer industry from its inception in 1974 through 1994, we address the following questions. What product technology strategies increase the survival chances of entrants into new, technologically dynamic industries? Does the effectiveness of these strategies differ by pre-entry experience? Does the effectiveness of these strategies differ by when firms enter a new industry? Consistent with the published literature, we find that diversifying entrants have an initial survival advantage over entrepreneurial startups. But, we find the reverse for later entrants: startups that enter later in the industry have a survival advantage over the later entering diversifying entrants. We explain this finding in terms of the firms' product technology strategies (i.e., offering products based on the technology standard and products incorporating the latest technology), pre-entry experience, and entry timing. Our findings highlight that it is crucial to study what firms do after they enter a new industry to more completely understand their ultimate performance.

Key Words: innovation; industry evolution; marketing; diversifying entrants; entrepreneurial startups
History: Received: November 9, 2004;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. C. Dencker, M. Gruber, and S. K. Shah
Pre-Entry Knowledge, Learning, and the Survival of New Firms
Organization Science, May 1, 2009; 20(3): 516 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
R. Agarwal and C. E. Helfat
Strategic Renewal of Organizations
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 281 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.