Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 52, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 773-787
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0449
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shane, S.
Right arrow Articles by Aravindakshan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Effects of New Franchisor Partnering Strategies on Franchise System Size

Scott Shane, Venkatesh Shankar, Ashwin Aravindakshan

Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, 11119 Bellflower Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742

sas46{at}cwru.edu
venky{at}venkyshankar.com
glads79{at}yahoo.com

Many young firms use strategic actions to attract partners who help them increase the size of their operations quickly. This article examines the use of strategic actions to attract partners and increase system size in the context of franchising. We build on research in entrepreneurship, marketing, organization theory, strategic management, and finance to develop specific hypotheses about the influences of franchisor pricing policy and strategic control decisions on system size. We test these hypotheses empirically, using panel data on a sample of 1,292 business format franchise systems from 152 industries that were established in the United States between 1979 and 1996 and followed from their inception forward in time. Our model accounts for the endogeneity of strategic decisions, controls for unobserved firm and industry factors, and accounts for selection effects due to system failure. The results show that franchisors that grow larger (1) lower royalty rates as the systems age, (2) have low up-front franchise fees that rise over time, (3) own a small proportion of outlets and lower that percentage over time, (4) keep franchisees’ initial investment low, and (5) finance their franchisees.

Key Words: firm size; franchising; pricing; ownership; econometric model
History: Received: April 20, 2005;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
K. Kalaignanam, V. Shankar, and R. Varadarajan
Asymmetric New Product Development Alliances: Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnerships?
Management Science, March 1, 2007; 53(3): 357 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.