|
|
||||||||
Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, 11119 Bellflower Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
Many young firms use strategic actions to attract partners who help them increase the size of their operations quickly. This article examines the use of strategic actions to attract partners and increase system size in the context of franchising. We build on research in entrepreneurship, marketing, organization theory, strategic management, and finance to develop specific hypotheses about the influences of franchisor pricing policy and strategic control decisions on system size. We test these hypotheses empirically, using panel data on a sample of 1,292 business format franchise systems from 152 industries that were established in the United States between 1979 and 1996 and followed from their inception forward in time. Our model accounts for the endogeneity of strategic decisions, controls for unobserved firm and industry factors, and accounts for selection effects due to system failure. The results show that franchisors that grow larger (1) lower royalty rates as the systems age, (2) have low up-front franchise fees that rise over time, (3) own a small proportion of outlets and lower that percentage over time, (4) keep franchisees initial investment low, and (5) finance their franchisees.
Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
sas46{at}cwru.edu
venky{at}venkyshankar.com
glads79{at}yahoo.com
History: Received: April 20, 2005;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kalaignanam, V. Shankar, and R. Varadarajan Asymmetric New Product Development Alliances: Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnerships? Management Science, March 1, 2007; 53(3): 357 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |