Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 52, No. 2, February 2006, pp. 173-186
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0482
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ziedonis, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Overoptimism and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms

Robert A. Lowe, Arvids A. Ziedonis

Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, 701 Tappan Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

roblowe{at}andrew.cmu.edu
azied{at}umich.edu

Recent theoretical and empirical research on cognitive bias in decision making suggests that overoptimism critically influences entrepreneurs’ decisions to establish and sustain new ventures. We investigate whether such cognitive bias influences entrepreneurial venture performance using data on commercialization efforts for university inventions. In contrast to prior studies, our results suggest that entrepreneurial overoptimism does not appear to be the determining factor in the decision to found a firm. We do find that entrepreneurs continue unsuccessful development efforts for longer periods of time than do established firms, which is consistent with entrepreneurial overoptimism in the development of technologies with uncertain market prospects. This latter finding is also consistent with rationality-based models of decision-making behavior, however. We find that the economic returns associated with many of the technologies in our sample are realized after the start-up has been acquired by an established firm, suggesting that start-ups may serve as a transitional organizational form in the market for technology commercialization.

Key Words: entrepreneurship; university technology transfer; cognitive bias
History: Received: March 30, 2004;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Lomi, E. R. Larsen, and F. C. Wezel
Getting There: Exploring the Role of Expectations and Preproduction Delays in Processes of Organizational Founding
Organization Science, January 1, 2010; 21(1): 132 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
G. Dushnitsky
Entrepreneurial Optimism in the Market for Technological Inventions
Organization Science, January 1, 2010; 21(1): 150 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
R. L. Dillon and C. H. Tinsley
How Near-Misses Influence Decision Making Under Risk: A Missed Opportunity for Learning
Management Science, August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1425 - 1440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
E. Dechenaux, B. Goldfarb, S. Shane, and M. Thursby
Appropriability and Commercialization: Evidence from MIT Inventions
Management Science, May 1, 2008; 54(5): 893 - 906.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. Bercovitz and M. Feldman
Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level
Organization Science, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 69 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
A. A. Ziedonis
Real Options in Technology Licensing
Management Science, October 1, 2007; 53(10): 1618 - 1633.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.