This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jansen, J. J. P. Articles by Volberda, H. W. Search for Related Content

Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators

RSM Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
RSM Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
RSM Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
jjansen{at}rsm.nl
fbosch{at}rsm.nl
hvolberda{at}rsm.nl

Research on exploration and exploitation is burgeoning, yet our understanding of the antecedents and consequences of both activities remains rather unclear. We advance the growing body of literature by focusing on the apparent differences of exploration and exploitation and examining implications for using formal (i.e., centralization and formalization) and informal (i.e., connectedness) coordination mechanisms. This study further examines how environmental aspects (i.e., dynamism and competitiveness) moderate the effectiveness of exploratory and exploitative innovation. Results indicate that centralization negatively affects exploratory innovation, whereas formalization positively influences exploitative innovation. Interestingly, connectedness within units appears to be an important antecedent of both exploratory and exploitative innovation. Furthermore, our findings reveal that pursuing exploratory innovation is more effective in dynamic environments, whereas pursuing exploitative innovation is more beneficial to a unit’s financial performance in more competitive environments. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how ambidextrous organizations coordinate the development of exploratory and exploitative innovation in organizational units and successfully respond to multiple environmental conditions.

Key Words: organizational learning; performance; coordination mechanisms; exploration/exploitation
History: Received: October 25, 2004;

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Andriopoulos and M. W. Lewis Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation Organization Science, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 696 - 717. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. P. Jansen, M. P. Tempelaar, F. A. J. van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms Organization Science, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 797 - 811. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Q. Cao, E. Gedajlovic, and H. Zhang Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects Organization Science, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 781 - 796. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. J. M. Mom, F. A. J. van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms Organization Science, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 812 - 828. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Raisch, J. Birkinshaw, G. Probst, and M. L. Tushman Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance Organization Science, July 1, 2009; 20(4): 685 - 695. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Sidhu, H. R. Commandeur, and H. W. Volberda The Multifaceted Nature of Exploration and Exploitation: Value of Supply, Demand, and Spatial Search for Innovation Organization Science, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 20 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]