Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 52, No. 10, October 2006, pp. 1557-1576
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business

Kevin Zhu, Kenneth L. Kraemer, Sean Xu

The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3125
The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3125
The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3125

kzhu{at}uci.edu
kkraemer{at}uci.edu
xinx{at}uci.edu

This paper extends our previous studies on the assimilation of Internet-based e-business innovations by firms in an international setting. Drawing upon theories on the process and contexts of technology diffusion, we develop an integrative model to examine three assimilation stages: initiation -> adoption -> routinization. The model features technological, organizational, and environmental contexts as prominent antecedents of this three-stage assimilation process. Based on this model, we hypothesize how technology readiness, technology integration, firm size, global scope, managerial obstacles, competition intensity, and regulatory environment influence e-business assimilation at the firm level. A unique data set of 1,857 firms from 10 countries is used to test the conceptual model and hypotheses. To probe deeper into the influence of the environmental context, we compare two subsamples from developed and developing countries. Our empirical analysis leads to several key findings: (1) Competition positively affects initiation and adoption, but negatively impacts routinization, suggesting that too much competition is not necessarily good for technology assimilation because it drives firms to chase the latest technologies without learning how to use existing ones effectively. (2) Large firms tend to enjoy resource advantages at the initiation stage, but have to overcome structural inertia in later stages. (3) We also find that economic environments shape innovation assimilation: Regulatory environment plays a more important role in developing countries than in developed countries. Moreover, while technology readiness is the strongest factor facilitating assimilation in developing countries, technology integration turns out to be the strongest in developed countries, implying that as e-business evolves, the key determinant of its assimilation shifts from accumulation to integration of technologies. Together, these findings offer insights into how innovation assimilation is influenced by contextual factors, and how the effects may vary across different stages and in different environments.

Key Words: technology diffusion; innovation assimilation; assimilation process; e-business; competition; firm size; technology integration; international perspective
History: Received: December 19, 2003;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Information Systems ResearchHome page
S. Dong, S. X. Xu, and K. X. Zhu
Research Note--Information Technology in Supply Chains: The Value of IT-Enabled Resources Under Competition
Information Systems Research, March 1, 2009; 20(1): 18 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.