Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 52, No. 1, January 2006, pp. 1-14
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0454
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savaskan, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Wassenhove, L. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Reverse Channel Design: The Case of Competing Retailers

R. Canan Savaskan, Luk N. Van Wassenhove

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Technology Management, INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France

r-savaskan{at}kellogg.northwestern.edu
luk.van-wassenhove{at}insead.edu

The economical and environmental benefits of product remanufacturing have been widely recognized in the literature and in practice. In this paper, we focus on the interaction between a manufacturer’s reverse channel choice to collect postconsumer goods and the strategic product pricing decisions in the forward channel when retailing is competitive. To this end, we model a direct product collection system, in which the manufacturer collects used products directly from the consumers (e.g., print and copy cartridges) and an indirect product collection system, in which the retailers act as product return points (e.g., single-use cameras, cellular phones). We first examine how the allocation of product collection to retailers impacts their strategic behavior in the product market, and we discuss the economic trade-offs the manufacturer faces while choosing an optimal reverse channel structure. When a direct collection system is used, channel profits are driven by the impact of scale of returns on collection effort, whereas in the indirect reverse channel, supply chain profits are driven by the competitive interaction between the retailers. Subsequently, we show that the buy-back payments transfered to the retailers for postconsumer goods provide a wholesale pricing flexibility that can be used to price discriminate between retailers of different profitability.

Key Words: reverse logistics; product remanufacturing; supply chain coordination; distribution channels
History: Received: May 22, 2001;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MSOMHome page
J. D. Shulman, A. T. Coughlan, and R. C. Savaskan
Optimal Restocking Fees and Information Provision in an Integrated Demand-Supply Model of Product Returns
MSOM, October 1, 2009; 11(4): 577 - 594.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Transportation ScienceHome page
K. Sahyouni, R. C. Savaskan, and M. S. Daskin
A Facility Location Model for Bidirectional Flows
Transportation Science, November 1, 2007; 41(4): 484 - 499.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.