This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chintagunta, P. Articles by Goh, K. Y. Search for Related Content

Beyond the Endogeneity Bias: The Effect of Unmeasured Brand Characteristics on Household-Level Brand Choice Models

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
pradeep.chintagunta{at}gsb.uchicago.edu
jdube{at}gsb.uchicago.edu
kgoh{at}gsb.uchicago.edu

We investigate the role of potential weekly brand-specific characteristics that influence consumer choices, but are unobserved or unmeasurable by the researcher. We use an empirical approach, based on the estimation methods used for standard random coefficients logit models, to account for the presence of such unobserved attributes. Using household scanner panel data, we find evidence that ignoring such time-varying latent (to the researcher) characteristics can lead to two types of problems. First, consistent with previous literature, we find that these unobserved characteristics may lead to biased estimates of the mean price response parameters. This argument is based on a form of price endogeneity. If marketing managers set prices based on consumer willingness to pay, then the observed prices will likely be correlated with the latent (to the researcher) brand characteristics. We resolve this problem by using an instrumental variables procedure. Our findings suggest that simply ignoring these attributes may also lead to larger estimates of the variance in the heterogeneity distribution of preferences and price sensitivities across households. This could overstate the benefits from marketing activities such as household-level targeting. We resolve the problem by using weekly brand intercepts, embedded in a random coefficients brand choice model, to control for weekly brand-specific characteristics, while accounting for household heterogeneity. Overall, our results extend the finding on the endogeneity bias from the mean of the heterogeneity distribution (i.e., the price effect) to include the variance of that distribution.

Key Words: brand choice; choice models; econometric models; targeting; endogeneity; instrumental variables
History: Received: July 7, 2003;

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Chu, P. Chintagunta, and J. Cebollada Research Note--A Comparison of Within-Household Price Sensitivity Across Online and Offline Channels Marketing Science, March 1, 2008; 27(2): 283 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Horsky, S. Misra, and P. Nelson Observed and Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Brand-Choice Models Marketing Science, July 1, 2006; 25(4): 322 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]