Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 51, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 756-770
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns

Jasjit Singh

INSEAD, 1 Ayer Rajah Avenue, 138676 Singapore
jasjit.singh{at}insead.edu, http://www.jasjitsingh.com

This paper examines whether interpersonal networks help explain two widely documented patterns of knowledge diffusion: (1) geographic localization of knowledge flows, and (2) concentration of knowledge flows within firm boundaries. I measure knowledge flows using patent citation data, and employ a novel regression framework based on choice-based sampling to estimate the probability of knowledge flow between inventors of any two patents. As expected, intraregional and intrafirm knowledge flows are found to be stronger than those across regional or firm boundaries. I explore whether these patterns can be explained by direct and indirect network ties among inventors, as inferred from past collaborations among them. The existence of a tie is found to be associated with a greater probability of knowledge flow, with the probability decreasing as the path length (geodesic) increases. Furthermore, the effect of regional or firm boundaries on knowledge flow decreases once interpersonal ties have been accounted for. In fact, being in the same region or firm is found to have little additional effect on the probability of knowledge flow among inventors who already have close network ties. The overall evidence is consistent with a view that interpersonal networks are important in determining observed patterns of knowledge diffusion.

Key Words: knowledge spillovers; technology diffusion; social networks; interpersonal ties; innovation
History: Received: May 4, 2004;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
L. Fleming, C. King III, and A. I. Juda
Small Worlds and Regional Innovation
Organization Science, November 1, 2007; 18(6): 938 - 954.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. Nadkarni and V. K. Narayanan
The Evolution of Collective Strategy Frames in High- and Low-Velocity Industries
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 688 - 710.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
A. Agrawal, I. Cockburn, and J. McHale
Gone but not forgotten: knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships
J. Econ. Geogr., November 1, 2006; 6(5): 571 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. Zhao
Conducting R&D in Countries with Weak Intellectual Property Rights Protection
Management Science, August 1, 2006; 52(8): 1185 - 1199.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.