Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 51, No. 2, February 2005, pp. 208-220
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0317
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terwiesch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

An Empirical Analysis of Forecast Sharing in the Semiconductor Equipment Supply Chain

Christian Terwiesch, Z. Justin Ren, Teck H. Ho, Morris A. Cohen

Department of Operations and Information Management, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Operations and Technology Management Department, School of Management, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Marketing Group, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Department of Operations and Information Management, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

terwiesch{at}wharton.upenn.edu
ren{at}bu.edu
hoteck{at}haas.berkeley.edu
cohen{at}wharton.upenn.edu

We study the demand forecast-sharing process between a buyer of customized production equipment and a set of equipment suppliers. Based on a large data collection we undertook in the semiconductor equipment supply chain, we empirically investigate the relationship between the buyer's forecasting behavior and the supplier's delivery performance. The buyer's forecasting behavior is characterized by the frequency and magnitude of forecast revisions it requests (forecast volatility) as well as by the fraction of orders that were forecasted but never actually purchased (forecast inflation). The supplier's delivery performance is measured by its ability to meet delivery dates requested by the customers. Based on a duration analysis, we are able to show that suppliers penalize buyers for unreliable forecasts by providing lower service levels. Vice versa, we also show that buyers penalize suppliers that have a history of poor service by providing them with overly inflated forecasts.

Key Words: forecast sharing; trust; empirical methods; supply chain management; collaborative planning
History: Received: January 15, 2003;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MSOMHome page
M. Fisher
Strengthening the Empirical Base of Operations Management
MSOM, January 1, 2007; 9(4): 368 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
G. P. Cachon, T. Randall, and G. M. Schmidt
In Search of the Bullwhip Effect
MSOM, January 1, 2007; 9(4): 457 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.