Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 51, No. 2, February 2005, pp. 167-180
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0322
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bish, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Biller, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Managing Flexible Capacity in a Make-to-Order Environment

Ebru K. Bish, Ana Muriel, Stephan Biller

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, and Departamento de Economia e Historia Económica, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Manufacturing Systems Research Laboratory, General Motors Research and Development Center, Warren, Michigan

ebru{at}vt.edu
muriel{at}ecs.umass.edu
stephan.biller{at}gm.com

Flexible capacity has been shown to be very effective to hedge against forecast errors at the investment stage. In a make-to-order environment, this flexibility can also be used to hedge against variability in customer orders in the short term. For that purpose, production levels must be adjusted each period to match current demands, to give priority to the higher margin product, or to satisfy the closest customer. However, this will result in swings in production, inducing larger order variability at upstream suppliers and significantly higher component inventory levels at the manufacturer. Through a stylized two-plant, two-product capacitated manufacturing setting, we show that the performance of the system depends heavily on the allocation mechanism used to assign products to the available capacity. Although managers would be inclined to give priority to higher-margin products or to satisfy customers from their closest production site, these practices lead to greater swings in production, result in higher operational costs, and may reduce profits.

Key Words: resource flexibility; capacity allocation; supply chain performance; demand uncertainty; operational hedging
History: Received: December 6, 2000;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MSOMHome page
A. Muriel, A. Somasundaram, and Y. Zhang
Impact of Partial Manufacturing Flexibility on Production Variability
MSOM, January 1, 2006; 8(2): 192 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.