|
|
||||||||
Harvard Business School, 237 Morgan Hall, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
We reflect on the evolution of the strategy field as seen through the window of Management Science. Reflecting the diverse disciplinary roots of strategy research, we identify a broad-ranging body of work that varies with respect to the assumptions made regarding individual rationality and the level of analysis at which the research is carried out. We argue that recent developments begin to delineate a potentially unifying conceptual framework for treating the field's defining questionsthe conceptual apparatus of evolutionary economics. We conclude by laying out important challenges for evolutionary economics if it is to serve as a foundation for both the positive and the normative research agendas of the strategy field.
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 2000 Steinberg-Dietrich Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
levinthal{at}wharton.upenn.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Argote and H. R. Greve A Behavioral Theory of the Firm--40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 337 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Pitelis A Behavioral Resource-Based View of the Firm: The Synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959) Organization Science, May 1, 2007; 18(3): 478 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Mahoney and A. M. McGahan The field of strategic management within the evolving science of strategic organization Strategic Organization, February 1, 2007; 5(1): 79 - 99. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levinthal The Neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm and the strategy field Ind. Corp. Change, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 391 - 394. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gavetti Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Capabilities' Development Organization Science, November 1, 2005; 16(6): 599 - 617. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |