Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 49, No. 9, September 2003, pp. 1180-1195
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1180.16564
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlile, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rebentisch, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Into the Black Box: The Knowledge Transformation Cycle

Paul R. Carlile, Eric S. Rebentisch

Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, E52-567, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
Center for Technology, Policy, and Industrial Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 41-205, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

carlile{at}mit.edu
erebenti{at}mit.edu

This paper examines how knowledge is integrated in complex technology and product development settings. By framing the task of knowledge integration as a cycle, we highlight the inability of current knowledge transfer theories to explain the consequences that arise from the path-dependent nature of knowledge. We compare the complexity of this knowledge integration task to previous efforts in terms of its novelty and the organizational properties of specialization and dependence that are required. Drawing on evidence from two empirical studies, we outline three stages of the "knowledge transformation cycle," which addresses the complexity of this integration task. We conclude with the implications of this knowledge transformation cycle on our understanding of knowledge management and organizational learning.

Key Words: Knowledge Transfer; Boundary Spanning; Organizational Learning; Product Development
History: Received: March 4, 2001;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Information Systems ResearchHome page
G. C. Kane and M. Alavi
Casting the Net: A Multimodal Network Perspective on User-System Interactions
Information Systems Research, September 1, 2008; 19(3): 253 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. L. Jarvenpaa and A. Majchrzak
Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks
Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 260 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
G. C. Kane and M. Alavi
Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes
Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 796 - 812.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
J. A. Howard-Grenville
Developing Issue-Selling Effectiveness over Time: Issue Selling as Resourcing
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 560 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
L. Dibiaggio
Design complexity, vertical disintegration and knowledge organization in the semiconductor industry
Ind. Corp. Change, April 29, 2007; (2007) dtm006v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
L. J. Menor, M. M. Kristal, and E. D. Rosenzweig
Examining the Influence of Operational Intellectual Capital on Capabilities and Performance
MSOM, January 1, 2007; 9(4): 559 - 578.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
P. R. Carlile
Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries
Organization Science, September 1, 2004; 15(5): 555 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.