Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 49, No. 7, July 2003, pp. 839-856
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.7.839.16387
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shumsky, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pinker, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Gatekeepers and Referrals in Services

Robert A. Shumsky, Edieal J. Pinker

William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627

shumsky{at}simon.rochester.edu
pinker{at}simon.rochester.edu

This paper examines services in which customers encounter a gatekeeper who makes an initial diagnosis of the customer's problem and then may refer the customer to a specialist. The gatekeeper may also attempt to solve the problem, but the probability of treatment success decreases as the problem's complexity increases. Given the costs of treatment by the gatekeeper and the specialist, we find the firm's optimal referral rate from a particular gatekeeper to the specialists. We then consider the principal–agent problem that arises when the gatekeeper, but not the firm, observes the gatekeeper's treatment ability as well as the complexity of each customer's problem. We examine the relative benefits of compensation systems designed to overcome the effects of this information asymmetry and show that bonuses based solely on referral rates do not always ensure first–best system performance and that an appropriate bonus based on customer volume may be necessary as well. We also consider the value of such output–based contracts when gatekeepers are heterogeneous in ability, so that two gatekeeper types face different probabilities of treatment success when given the same problem. We show that the firm may achieve first–best performance by either offering two contracts that separate the gatekeeper types or by offering a single contract that coordinates the treatment decisions of both gatekeepers.

Key Words: Stochastic Model Applications; Personnel; Principal–Agent Problems; Routing/Triage
History: Received: December 20, 2001;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S. Hasija, E. J. Pinker, and R. A. Shumsky
Call Center Outsourcing Contracts Under Information Asymmetry
Management Science, April 1, 2008; 54(4): 793 - 807.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
Z. J. Ren and Y.-P. Zhou
Call Center Outsourcing: Coordinating Staffing Level and Service Quality
Management Science, February 1, 2008; 54(2): 369 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
F. de Vericourt and Y.-P. Zhou
Managing Response Time in a Call-Routing Problem with Service Failure
Operations Research, November 1, 2005; 53(6): 968 - 981.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
E. D. Gunes and O. Z. Aksin
Value Creation in Service Delivery: Relating Market Segmentation, Incentives, and Operational Performance
MSOM, January 1, 2004; 6(4): 338 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.