This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Deshpande, V. Articles by Donohue, K. Search for Related Content

A Threshold Inventory Rationing Policy for Service–Differentiated Demand Classes

Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Department of Operations and Information Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104–6366
Department of Operations and Management Science, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
deshpandev{at}mgmt.purdue.edu
cohen{at}wharton.upenn.edu
kdonohue{at}csom.umn.edu

Motivated by a study of the logistics systems used to manage consumable service parts for the U.S. military, we consider a static threshold–based rationing policy that is useful when pooling inventory across two demand classes characterized by different arrival rates and shortage (stockout and delay) costs. The scheme operates as a (Q, r) policy with the following feature. Demands from both classes are filled on a first–come–first–serve basis as long as on–hand inventory lies above a threshold levelK. Once on–hand inventory falls below this level, low–priority (i.e., low shortage cost) demand is backordered while high–priority demand continues to be filled. We analyze this static policy first under the assumption that backorders are filled according to a special threshold clearing mechanism. Structural results for the key performance measures are established to enable an efficient solution algorithm for computing stock control and rationing parameters (i.e.,Q, r, andK). Numerical results confirm that the solution under this special threshold clearing mechanism closely approximates that of the priority clearing policy. We next highlight conditions where our policy offers significant savings over traditional "round–up" and "separate stock" policies encountered in the military and elsewhere. Finally, we develop a lower bound on the cost of the optimal rationing policy. Numerical results show that the performance gap between our static threshold policy and the optimal policy is small in environments typical of the military and high–technology industries.

Key Words: Inventory Rationing; Service Differentiation; Military Application
History: Received: July 1, 2000;

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Shumsky and F. Zhang Dynamic Capacity Management with Substitution Operations Research, May 1, 2009; 57(3): 671 - 684. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-P. Gayon, S. Benjaafar, and F. de Vericourt Using Imperfect Advance Demand Information in Production-Inventory Systems with Multiple Customer Classes MSOM, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 128 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Huang and S. M. R. Iravani Technical Note--A Make-to-Stock System with Multiple Customer Classes and Batch Ordering Operations Research, September 1, 2008; 56(5): 1312 - 1320. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Zipkin On the Structure of Lost-Sales Inventory Models Operations Research, July 1, 2008; 56(4): 937 - 944. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Bernstein and F. de Vericourt Competition for Procurement Contracts with Service Guarantees Operations Research, May 1, 2008; 56(3): 562 - 575. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Zhao, J. K. Ryan, and V. Deshpande Optimal Dynamic Production and Inventory Transshipment Policies for a Two-Location Make-to-Stock System Operations Research, March 1, 2008; 56(2): 400 - 410. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Gurvich, M. Armony, and A. Mandelbaum Service-Level Differentiation in Call Centers with Fully Flexible Servers Management Science, February 1, 2008; 54(2): 279 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Everingham, G. Polaski, F. Riedlin, M. Shirk, V. Deshpande, and A. V. Iyer Operations Research Enhances Supply Chain Management at the US Coast Guard Aircraft Repair and Supply Center Interfaces, January 1, 2008; 38(1): 61 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Arslan, S. C. Graves, and T. A. Roemer A Single-Product Inventory Model for Multiple Demand Classes Management Science, September 1, 2007; 53(9): 1486 - 1500. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Deshpande, A. V. Iyer, and R. Cho Efficient Supply Chain Management at the U.S. Coast Guard Using Part-Age Dependent Supply Replenishment Policies Operations Research, November 1, 2006; 54(6): 1028 - 1040. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Zhao and D. Simchi-Levi Performance Analysis and Evaluation of Assemble-to-Order Systems with Stochastic Sequential Lead Times Operations Research, July 1, 2006; 54(4): 706 - 724. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Cohen, N. Agrawal, and V. Agrawal Achieving Breakthrough Service Delivery Through Dynamic Asset Deployment Strategies Interfaces, May 1, 2006; 36(3): 259 - 271. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Q. Ding, P. Kouvelis, and J. M. Milner Dynamic Pricing Through Discounts for Optimizing Multiple-Class Demand Fulfillment Operations Research, January 1, 2006; 54(1): 169 - 183. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Zhao, V. Deshpande, and J. K. Ryan Inventory Sharing and Rationing in Decentralized Dealer Networks Management Science, April 1, 2005; 51(4): 531 - 547. [Abstract] [PDF]