|
|
||||||||
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 321 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Interruptions have commonly been viewed as negative and as something for managers to control or limit. In this paper, I explore the relationship between interruptions and acquisition of routinesa form of knowledgeby teams. Recent research suggests that interruptions may play an important role in changing organizational routines, and as such may influence knowledge transfer activities. Results suggest that interruptions influence knowledge transfer effort, and both knowledge transfer effort and interruptions are positively related to the acquisition of new work routines. I conclude with implications for research and practice.
mzellmer-bruhn{at}csom.umn.edu
History: Received: February 28, 2001;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. M. Desai Constrained Growth: How Experience, Legitimacy, and Age Influence Risk Taking in Organizations Organization Science, July 1, 2008; 19(4): 594 - 608. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Tucker, I. M. Nembhard, and A. C. Edmondson Implementing New Practices: An Empirical Study of Organizational Learning in Hospital Intensive Care Units Management Science, June 1, 2007; 53(6): 894 - 907. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levinthal and C. Rerup Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning Organization Science, July 1, 2006; 17(4): 502 - 513. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Olivera and S. G. Straus Group-to-Individual Transfer of Learning: Cognitive and Social Factors Small Group Research, August 1, 2004; 35(4): 440 - 465. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Argote, B. McEvily, and R. Reagans Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes Management Science, April 1, 2003; 49(4): 571 - 582. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |