Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 49, No. 11, November 2003, pp. 1445-1456
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1445.20579
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geoffrion, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Krishnan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

E-Business and Management Science: Mutual Impacts (Part 2 of 2)

Arthur M. Geoffrion, Ramayya Krishnan

Decisions, Operations, and Technology Management, John E. Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Box 951481, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481
The Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

ageoffri{at}anderson.ucla.edu
rk2x{at}cmu.edu

This concludes a two-part commentary on management science and e-business, the theme of this two-part special issue. After reviewing the topical clusters that give organization to both parts, we sketch the papers appearing in this second part from the perspective of two key questions concerning the impact of the emerging digital economy on management science research: What fundamentally new research questions arise, and what kind of research enables progress on them. We then offer summary comments on the second question based on the papers in both parts. The principal conclusions are that, in meeting the challenges posed by the digital economy, management science researchers are (a) making greater use of parts of economics and computer science/information technology, and (b) exploiting the improving productivity advantages of empirical and methodological work in comparison with theoretical work.

Key Words: E-Business; Information Infrastructure; Online Markets; Management Science



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
InterfacesHome page
R. M. Harstad and A. S. Pekec
Relevance to Practice and Auction Theory: A Memorial Essay for Michael Rothkopf
Interfaces, September 1, 2008; 38(5): 367 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
A. S. Pekec and I. Tsetlin
Revenue Ranking of Discriminatory and Uniform Auctions with an Unknown Number of Bidders
Management Science, September 1, 2008; 54(9): 1610 - 1623.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.