This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kaplan, E. H. Articles by Garstka, S. J. Search for Related Content

March Madness and the Office Pool

Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8200
Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8200
edward.kaplan{at}yale.edu
stanley.garstka{at}yale.edu

March brings March Madness, the annual conclusion to the U.S. men's college basketball season with two single elimination basketball tournaments showcasing the best college teams in the country. Almost as mad is the plethora of office pools across the country where the object is to pick a priori as many game winners as possible in the tournament. More generally, the object in an office pool is to maximize total pool points, where different points are awarded for different correct winning predictions. We consider the structure of single elimination tournaments, and show how to efficiently calculate the mean and the variance of the number of correctly predicted wins (or more generally the total points earned in an office pool) for a given slate of predicted winners. We apply these results to both random and Markov tournaments. We then show how to determine optimal office pool predictions that maximize the expected number of points earned in the pool. Considering various Markov probability models for predicting game winners based on regular season performance, professional sports rankings, and Las Vegas betting odds, we compare our predictions with what actually happened in past NCAA and NIT tournaments. These models perform similarly, achieving overall prediction accuracies of about 58%, but do not surpass the simple strategy of picking the seeds when the goal is to pick as many game winners as possible. For a more sophisticated point structure, however, our models do outperform the strategy of picking the seeds.

Key Words: March Madness; Office Pools; Probability Modeling; Statistical Estimation; Markov Models; Dynamic Programming
History: Received: December 8, 1999;

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Clair and D. Letscher Optimal Strategies for Sports Betting Pools Operations Research, November 1, 2007; 55(6): 1163 - 1177. [Abstract] [PDF]