Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 47, No. 11, November 2001, pp. 1457-1475
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1457.10253
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarkar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sriram, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Bayesian Models for Early Warning of Bank Failures

Sumit Sarkar, Ram S. Sriram

Information Systems and Operations Management, School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083
School of Accountancy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303

sumit{at}utdallas.edu
rsriram{at}gsu.edu

The focus of this research is to demonstrate how probabilistic models may be used to provide early warnings for bank failures. While prior research in the auditing literature has recognized the applicability of a Bayesian belief revision framework for many audit tasks, empirical evidence has suggested that auditors' cognitive decision processes often violate probability axioms. We believe that some of the well-documented cognitive limitations of a human auditor can be compensated by an automated system. In particular, we demonstrate that a formal belief revision scheme can be incorporated into an automated system to provide reliable probability estimates for early warning of bank failures. The automated system examines financial ratios as predictors of a bank's performance and assesses the posterior probability of a banks financial health (alternatively, financial distress). We examine two different probabilistic models, one that is simpler and makes more assumptions, while the other that is somewhat more complex but makes fewer assumptions. We find that both models are able to make accurate predictions with the help of historical data to estimate the required probabilities. In particular, the more complex model is found to be very well calibrated in its probability estimates. We posit that such a model can serve as a useful decision aid to an auditor's judgment process.

Key Words: Belief Revision; Calibration; Classification; Information Theory; Financial Distress; Audit
History: Received: November 21, 1998;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
H. Cavusoglu and S. Raghunathan
Configuration of Detection Software: A Comparison of Decision and Game Theory Approaches
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2004; 1(3): 131 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by INFORMS.