Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 46, No. 9, September 2000, pp. 1200-1213
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.46.9.1200.12235
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Amato, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wein, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Management of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Infection: Analyzing When to Change Therapy

Rebecca M. D'Amato, Richard T. D'Aquila, Lawrence M. Wein

Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California 90407
Infectious Disease Unit and AIDS Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129
Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

damato{at}rand.org
daquila{at}helix.mgh.harvard.edu
lwein{at}mit.edu

We analyze two joint decisions in the management of HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy: how frequently to measure a patient's virus level, and when to switch therapy. The underlying stochastic model captures the initial suppression and eventual rebound of the virus level in the blood of a typical HIV-infected patient undergoing treatment. We consider two classes of policies: a viral load policy, which triggers a change in therapy when the current virus level divided by the smallest level achieved thus far exceeds a prespecified threshold, and a proactive policy, which is similar to the viral load policy but also switches drugs at a prespecified time if no evidence of viral rebound has been seen. We find approximate analytical expressions for the probability of switching before the virus reaches its nadir (minimum value) and the mean delay in detection of viral rebound (i.e., the time interval from when the viral nadir occurs until the switch in therapy). Numerical results show that the proactive policy outperforms (i.e., a smaller detection delay for a given probability of prenadir switching) the viral load policy and recent recommendations by an expert AIDS panel, and may delay the onset of multidrug resistance in a significant proportion of patients who experience drug failure.

Key Words: AIDS; stochastic modeling; censored measurements; Slepian's inequality
History: Received: November 9, 1998;





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by INFORMS.