Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 44, No. 7, July 1998, pp. 879-895
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.44.7.879
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tversky, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

A Belief-Based Account of Decision Under Uncertainty

Craig R. Fox, Amos Tversky

Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0120
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

We develop a belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. This model predicts decisions under uncertainty from (i) judgments of probability, which are assumed to satisfy support theory; and (ii) decisions under risk, which are assumed to satisfy prospect theory. In two experiments, subjects evaluated uncertain prospects and assessed the probability of the respective events. Study 1 involved the 1995 professional basketball playoffs; Study 2 involved the movement of economic indicators in a simulated economy. The results of both studies are consistent with the belief-based account, but violate the partition inequality implied by the classical theory of decision under uncertainty.

Key Words: Decision Making; Risk; Uncertainty; Expected Utility; Prospect Theory; Support Theory; Decision Weights; Judgment; Probability



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
H. Bleichrodt, U. Schmidt, and H. Zank
Additive Utility in Prospect Theory
Management Science, May 1, 2009; 55(5): 863 - 873.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
A. Baillon
Eliciting Subjective Probabilities Through Exchangeable Events: An Advantage and a Limitation
Decision Analysis, June 1, 2008; 5(2): 76 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
R. T. Clemen and C. Ulu
Interior Additivity and Subjective Probability Assessment of Continuous Variables
Management Science, April 1, 2008; 54(4): 835 - 851.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
P. P. Wakker, D. R. M. Timmermans, and I. Machielse
The Effects of Statistical Information on Risk and Ambiguity Attitudes, and on Rational Insurance Decisions
Management Science, November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1770 - 1784.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. Abdellaoui, F. Vossmann, and M. Weber
Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty
Management Science, September 1, 2005; 51(9): 1384 - 1399.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. Kilka and M. Weber
What Determines the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function Under Uncertainty?
Management Science, December 1, 2001; 47(12): 1712 - 1726.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
G. Wu and R. Gonzalez
Nonlinear Decision Weights in Choice Under Uncertainty
Management Science, January 1, 1999; 45(1): 74 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by INFORMS.