Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 44, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 629-644
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.44.5.629
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Hippel, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Economics of Product Development by Users: The Impact of "Sticky" Local Information

Eric von Hippel

Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Those who solve more of a given type of problem tend to get better at it—which suggests that problems of any given type should be brought to specialists for a solution. However, in this paper we argue that agency-related costs and information transfer costs ("sticky" local information) will tend drive the locus of problem-solving in the opposite direction—away from problem-solving by specialist suppliers, and towards those who directly benefit from a solution and who have difficult-to-transfer local information about a particular application being solved, such as the direct users of a product or service. We examine the actual location of design activities in two fields in which custom products are produced by "mass-customization" methods: application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and computer telephony integration (CTI) systems. In both, we find that users rather than suppliers are the actual designers of the application-specific portion of the product types examined. We offer anecdotal evidence that the pattern of user-based customization we have documented in these two fields is in fact quite general, and we discuss implications for research and practice.

Key Words: User Innovation; Sticky Information; Local Information; Heterogeneous Markets; Mass Customization; Specialization in Problem Solving; Task Partitioning



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
D. M. Waguespack and L. Fleming
Scanning the Commons? Evidence on the Benefits to Startups Participating in Open Standards Development
Management Science, February 1, 2009; 55(2): 210 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
R. J. Boland Jr., K. Lyytinen, and Y. Yoo
Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction
Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 631 - 647.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
O. Toubia and L. Flores
Adaptive Idea Screening Using Consumers
Marketing Science, May 1, 2007; 26(3): 342 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
G. von Krogh and E. von Hippel
The Promise of Research on Open Source Software
Management Science, July 1, 2006; 52(7): 975 - 983.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. Van Alstyne and E. Brynjolfsson
Global Village or Cyber-Balkans? Modeling and Measuring the Integration of Electronic Communities
Management Science, June 1, 2005; 51(6): 851 - 868.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S. A. Shane and K. T. Ulrich
50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science
Management Science, February 1, 2004; 50(2): 133 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
R. Dewan, B. Jing, and A. Seidmann
Product Customization and Price Competition on the Internet
Management Science, August 1, 2003; 49(8): 1055 - 1070.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
E. v. Hippel and G. v. Krogh
Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science
Organization Science, March 1, 2003; 14(2): 209 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. A. Schilling, P. Vidal, R. E. Ployhart, and A. Marangoni
Learning by Doing Something Else: Variation, Relatedness, and the Learning Curve
Management Science, January 1, 2003; 49(1): 39 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
E. von Hippel and R. Katz
Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits
Management Science, July 1, 2002; 48(7): 821 - 833.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
P. D. Morrison, J. H. Roberts, and E. von Hippel
Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market
Management Science, December 1, 2000; 46(12): 1513 - 1527.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by INFORMS.