Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 44, No. 11-Part-2, November 1998, pp. S1-S18
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.44.11.S1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van den Bulte, C.
Right arrow Articles by Moenaert, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The Effects of R&D Team Co-location on Communication Patterns among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing

Christophe Van den Bulte, Rudy K. Moenaert

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6371
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Ghent, Hoveniersberg 4, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Reducing the physical distance among R&D engineers and between R&D and marketing is widely believed to result in more frequent communication, and hence higher product development performance. However, the empirical evidence for the effect of co-location on communication frequency is problematic for two reasons: (1) the evidence often features either little contextual realism or doubtful internal validity, and (2) the analysis does not deal with the statistical problems typical of network data. Our study avoids the first problem by using sequential network data collected from a quasi-experiment at an industrial company that regrouped its R&D teams into a new facility. We avoid the second problem by using Wasserman and Iacobucci's (1988) method for the statistical analysis of sequential network data. Our results show that communication among R&D teams was enhanced after co-locating these teams. Surprisingly, communication frequency between R&D and marketing was not affected by the increased physical distance. This may suggest that business procedures accompanying the relocation prevented a widening gap between R&D and marketing. Alternatively, it may indicate that the effect of co-location depends on the content and medium of the communication flows.

Key Words: New Product Development; Co-location; R&D–Marketing Interface; Social Networks



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. E. Sosa, S. D. Eppinger, and C. M. Rowles
The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development
Management Science, December 1, 2004; 50(12): 1674 - 1689.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
J. N. Cummings
Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization
Management Science, March 1, 2004; 50(3): 352 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
S. A. Shane and K. T. Ulrich
50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science
Management Science, February 1, 2004; 50(2): 133 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by INFORMS.